Carl Cohen argues that humans are justified in dominating animals because they are at the 'top.' What is the critique of this argument presented in the video?

The critique is that this argument is similar to the 'might makes right' justification used by slave owners, which is generally considered morally wrong.

The video discusses the argument from tradition as a justification for using animals. Explain this argument and why it is considered 'philosophically suspect'.

The argument from tradition suggests that because humans have always used animals, it is acceptable. It's suspect because tradition alone doesn't justify moral actions; slavery was also a tradition.

What does 'Equal Consideration of Interests' mean, according to Peter Singer, and how does it apply to the treatment of animals?

It means giving equal weight to identical interests, regardless of the being. All beings have an interest in avoiding pain, so we should consider animal suffering equally with human suffering.

Human And Wildlife Interactions Lesson Plan for 9th Grade

Free to teach as-is — the teacher guide, student handout, and slides are included.

Teaching a different level? Adapt this lesson →

Free — we'll email you an access link. Google Docs format.

Objective

I can analyze the complex interactions between humans and wildlife in shared environments.

Part 1 of 4

Warm-up video

CrashCourse · 9:47Vetted channel

We don't generate video — this one is by CrashCourse on YouTube. The practice questions and exit ticket below were drafted by AI for this objective, and every question is editable in the teacher guide.

Part 2 of 4

Key concepts

3 concepts

1
Peter Singer uses the term speciesism to describe giving preference to our own species over another, even without morally relevant differences.
2
According to the principle of Equal Consideration of Interests, identical interests should be given equal weight, regardless of what type of being they occur in, such as the shared interest in avoiding pain.
3
Philosophers challenge individuals to be consistent with their beliefs and to justify their actions with reasons, especially when considering the treatment of non-human animals, rather than simply relying on tradition or convenience.

Part 3 of 4

Practice

12 questions

What is 'speciesism' as defined by Peter Singer?

According to the video, what is one argument used to justify treating animals differently than humans, and what is a counterargument to that justification?

Part 4 of 4

Exit ticket

Quick comprehension check

“Describe a complex interaction between humans and wildlife presented in the video, and explain the different perspectives involved.”

Sample answer included in the free materials

Get the materials

Teacher guide, student handout, and slides — free, in Google Docs format

Teacher Guide
Complete lesson plan with answer keys and alternate activities
Student Handout
Printable worksheet
Slides
Ready to present

We'll ask for your email to send your access link — nothing else.

Teaching a group at a different level?

Where are your students right now? We'll rebuild this lesson to match — including the teacher guide, student handout, and slides, saved to your Google Drive.

Adapt This Lesson

Human and Wildlife Interactions

Objective

Warm-up video

Key concepts

Practice

Exit ticket

Get the materials

Teaching a group at a different level?

Related lessons

Dimensional Analysis and Unit Conversions

How Light Refracts

Cantidades escalares y vectoriales